|
Baptism and BetrothalSubject: Baptism articles Dear Pastor Ari, I very much enjoyed reading your articles on Baptism. I am a pastor in an Evangelical Presbyterian church in Michigan and gleaned a lot from your writing. As I have been preparing for an upcoming sermon, the Lord has demonstrated to me how much the term baptism is referring to Baptism of the Holy Spirit in the NT. Rom 6, Gal. 4, Eph. 4, and Col. 2. Quick question. Why wouldn’t 1 Peter also be baptism of the Holy Spirit as well? Thx. and blessings! Pastor x. x. [identity concealed for privacy] Dear Pastor “Timothy,” If you are referring specifically to 1 Pet. 3:21, I would agree with you that that Peter is referring to Believer’s Mikvah, the immersion of a new Believer in Messiah in water, again as a symbol of what has already transpired in the Believer’s life. Not that the actual water, or even the act of immersion, has any efficacious power at all, but that it is the outward symbol of the completed work of Messiah as applied to the Believer by Ruach HaKodesh (the Holy Spirit). I particularly like Dr. David Stern’s translation in
the Complete Jewish Bible: “This also prefigures what delivers us
now, the water of immersion, which is not the removal of dirt from the
body, but one’s pledge to keep a good conscience toward The act of water baptism, I
believe, is very closely related to the ancient Jewish practice of
betrothal.* [This is in itself a
lengthy study I hope to address some day on the web site — but for now,
the “Reader’s Digest” version will have to suffice.] The Scriptures are
full of this marriage symbolism. In the betrothal process, a young man would take a
fancy to a young woman, and would ask his father to go “buy” her for him.
The boy’s father would meet with the girl’s father, and the “bride price”
would be negotiated. Then the boy and his father would write out the
ketubah, or marriage contract [the Torah is in many respects The boy would then pay the bride price [“You have been bought with a price.”] and recite the to the girl the ritual phrase, “I’m going to prepare a place for you. If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to myself, that where I am, there you may be also” (John 14:2,3). [And he would not drink wine with her again until after the marriage was consummated, usually about a year later.] He would then leave and begin construction on the new rooms that would form an addition to his father’s house, which would become the couple’s “apartment.” The son would never know when his father would consider the construction complete, but when the father was satisfied with the new apartment, he would tell the son to go claim his bride. The son would then immediately gather his part of the wedding party and set out to the girl’s home, usually in the evening. A “forerunner” [the “best man”] would be sent ahead of the groom, and as he approached the girl’s home, he would blow the shofar. The bride would hear the sound of the shofar and don her bridal clothes, and go out to meet her bridegroom. The bridesmaids, who hopefully had their lamps filled, would light them and go out to join the wedding party. The wedding ceremony would be immediately performed, followed by the 7-day wedding feast. The symbolism here is striking, and serves to interpret several of the Lord’s parables, as well as to explain many of His actions at the Passover Seder he shared on the night He was arrested. By accepting and drinking the cup, the talmidim [disciples], on behalf of all Believers who would come later, accepted Yeshua’s ketubah and became “betrothed” to Him. [According to John’s gospel, Judas left before the ketubah was offered and accepted.] And I feel that what Peter was trying to say in 1 Pet. 3:21 is that water baptism is the Believer’s initial pledge to accept Yeshua’s ketubah and became “betrothed” to Him. This pledge is re-affirmed each time the Believer partakes of the Lord’s Supper. Although I haven’t yet taken the time to address the subject on our website, I take very literally the concept of the “new creation” (2 Cor 5:17; Gal. 6:15 — same word, translated differently). Again, as David Stern renders them: “Therefore, if anyone is united with the Messiah, he is a new creation — the old has passed; look, what has come is fresh and new.” “For neither being circumcised nor being uncircumcised matters; what matters is being a new creation.” I believe that through the process of regeneration
Ruach HaKodesh takes one form of creation, a sinner, and places that
sinner positionally “into Messiah” where the sinner literally becomes a
new form of creation (a new “species” if you will), called in Scripture a
“Saint” … one who has been literally transformed and sanctified (set apart
for As alluded to in my Baptism study, though not spelled out in any particular detail, I believe this transformation process is part and parcel of the process of salvation. The caterpillar enters the cocoon, “dies”, and re-emerges as a butterfly. Yeshua died, entered the tomb, and emerged in His resurrected and glorified body which He will wear for all eternity. Just so, the new believer performs a reenactment of this process [which has already occurred on the spiritual plane] when he or she is placed beneath the waters of the mikvah and emerges to walk as a “new creation in Messiah.” I hope these additional comments prove helpful to you. Shalom in Messiah!! Dr. Ari Levitt-Sawyer _______________ See also Gerut (Conversion).
|
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material on this web site is provided without permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research under the "fair use" provisions of federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed further, except for "fair use" non-profit educational purposes, without permission of the copyright owner. *Ari Levitt is the shem kodesh of Messianic Pastor Dr. Rickard (Ari) Levitt-Sawyer. As the free expression of my religious beliefs, the content of this website is protected under the provisions of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Except where otherwise specifically indicated, the opinions expressed on this website are my own, are sometimes highly speculative in nature and subject to differing interpretations, and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any other organization or individual. If you disagree with my opinions, please CLICK HERE before contacting me.
|