![]() |
||||||
|
|
The contents of this sub-web should NOT be considered as at all political in nature, but rather as a statement of our sincere religious beliefs concerning the Biblical prophecies concerning the End of Days. This annoying warning has been intentionally placed at the top of every page in this sub-web to prevent anyone from accidentally viewing pro-American and pro-Israel materials that many in this country find very offensive. WARNING! The pages in this section of the website are decidedly not “politically correct” and will likely be extremely offensive to Liberals and Progressives. Some Conservatives and Moderates may actually be shocked or offended that this information is being presented on a “religious” website. I believe that America was created as “one nation, under God” by Divine Providence to serve as a safe haven for His people as we approach the End of Days; and, as such, it is my sincere religious belief (that has nothing to do with politics) that the future well-being of America is inextricably intertwined with that of Israel. Both America and Israel are now under attack by the Forces of Darkness, both from without and from within our borders, and the current corrupt “leadership” of the United States (in all three branches of government and in both major political parties) is actively engaged in the deliberate and carefully-planned destruction of both Israel and the America that was designed and established by our Founding Fathers and defined in our Constitution. I view these events as decidedly religious, and not primarily political. It is spiritual warfare between the Forces of Darkness and the Forces of Light! If the Muslim usurper currently residing in the White House is not the Antichrist of the book of the Revelation, then we are certainly experiencing a dress rehearsal for his appearing. Proceed at your own risk! Granted, not every action reported on this site was committed directly by Sheik Barack Hussein, but they were committed in his name and on his watch; as Liar-in-Chief, he is therefore responsible. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material on this web site is provided without permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research under the “fair use” provisions of federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed further, except for “fair use” non-profit educational purposes, without permission of the copyright owner. If you are the copyright owner and wish any material removed or modified, please contact us and we will be happy to comply.
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
| FamilyBible Home |
|||||
|
||||||
|
Pelosi Backs Senate Amendment to Censor Talk
Radio Infowars • March 6, 2009
“Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told CNSNews.com on Thursday that she supports an amendment to a Senate bill that would force the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ‘take actions to encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership and to ensure that broadcast station licenses are used in the public interest.’” On Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told CNSNews she supports an amendment to a Senate bill that would force the Federal Communications Commission to “take actions to encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership and to ensure that broadcast station licenses are used in the public interest.” House Conference Chairman Mike Pence, who is a former radio broadcaster, told CNSNews the amendment is a Trojan horse designed to restore the Fairness Doctrine, an FCC regulation dumped in 1987 that forced broadcasters to grant equal time to opposing points of view.
“Its clear to me that Democrats, having failed in their frontal assault on talk radio in America through the Fairness Doctrine, are now shifting strategy to a form of regulation that is essentially the Fairness Doctrine by stealth,” said Pence. The Senate amendment was attached to a bill granting Washington, D.C., a vote in the House of Representatives by Senate Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin. It was passed last Thursday in a vote along party lines. “I support Mr. Durbin in most things,” averred Pelosi. “Diversity in media ownership is very, very, important.” In response to the attachment of the “Durbin amendment,” Sen. Jim DeMint inserted an amendment banning the Fairness Doctrine to the same bill. It passed by a vote of 87-11 and will go to the House. Minority Leader John Boehner said he believes Republicans may be able to raise the votes to stop it. Not surprisingly, the so-called Durbin amendment is nearly identical to a policy position put out by Obama’s White House, which reads: “Encourage Diversity in Media Ownership: Encourage diversity in the ownership of broadcast media, promote the development of new media outlets for expression of diverse viewpoints, and clarify the public interest obligations of broadcasters who occupy the nation’s spectrum.” Obama’s policy position reflects that of his transition leader John Podesta. Podesta’s Center for American Progress, described as a “liberal think-tank,” released a policy paper in 2007 entitled The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio. “Thanks in part to funding from benefactors such as billionaire George Soros, the Center for American Progress has become in just five years an intellectual wellspring for Democratic policy proposals, including many that are shaping the agenda of the new Obama administration,” writes Edwin Chen for Bloomberg. Apparently, Obama and his adopted “progressive” policy proposals are at odds with the First Amendment. Of course, Rush Limbaugh’s EIB, Clear Channel, and Fox News will either pay to play or will hire a handful of token “progressives” in order to get around the new Fairness Doctrine, that is if it becomes law and the Supreme Court allows it to stand. If the bill becomes law and stands, it will be the small guys forced out of business, not the large communications and entertainment corporations. But then it is the small guys posing a real threat to the establishment, not Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, or Michael “Savage” Weiner, who represent the fake opposition. |
|
Articles in This Section |