|
Above This Level
Home Essentials Dispensations Eternal Life Baptism Followship TH100
On This Level
Contents Lesson 1 Lesson 2 Lesson 3 Lesson 4 Glossary Appendix The Author
Below This Level
|
|

|
The Biblical Doctrine Of
Believers’ Baptism
by
Rickard Leavitt Sawyer
ywlnb yra
ThM, ThD, DMin, MBA, CNHP |
Lesson One:
The Types or Kinds of Baptism in Scripture
And Jesus came up and spoke
to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on
earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in
the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to
observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to
the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:18-20)
“Christian
baptism is the immersion of a believer in water in the name of the
Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. It is an act of obedience
symbolizing the believer’s faith in a crucified, buried, and risen
Savior, the believer’s death to sin, the burial of the old life, and the
resurrection to walk in newness of life in Christ Jesus. It is a
testimony to his faith in the final resurrection of the dead. Being a
church ordinance, it is prerequisite to the privileges of church
membership and to the Lord’s Supper.”[1]
“Theologically,
baptism may be defined as an act of association or identification with
someone, some group, some message, or some event. … Christian baptism
means identification with the message of the Gospel, the person of the
Savior, and the group of believers.”[2]
Biblical doctrine makes a
distinction between five kinds of baptisms that are addressed in the Sacred
Text. These are:
1. the ceremonial washings of
objects under the tradition of the Pharisees;
2. the self-baptism (mikvah
or tevilah) of proselytes (converts) to Judaism;
3. the
baptism of Yochanan[3] the Baptizer;
4. the
baptism of Ruach HaKodesh[4] (the Holy Spirit); or
“real” baptism, and
5. the ceremonial immersion (mikvah
or tevilah) of Believers, or “ritual” baptism.
Only the last of these is the
subject of this paper, though the others will be mentioned briefly as point
of identification or as they relate to Believers’ ritual baptism.
According to the tradition of the Pharisees,
objects used for worship, pots and dishes used around the home, and, of
course, the hands of the faithful Jew were required to be put through
frequent and complex ceremonies of washings in order for them to be
considered kasher (or kosher), or ceremonially clean and
acceptable for use. Religious items could be used only for their designated
purpose, and household pots could only be used for certain kinds of foods.
For example, a pot that was used to contain any type of dairy product could
not be also used for meat. And before the faithful could eat any food, their
hands must first be washed in the prescribed manner following a rather
complex ceremony. During this ceremony, if any water came into contact with
any [ceremonially] “unclean” portion of the arms or body and then ran down
into the [ceremonially] “clean” portion of the hands, the hands were now
“unclean” and the ceremony had to be started from the beginning. It was this
ceremonial cleansing that the Pharisees were referring to when they rebuked
the Lord and His talmidim (disciples) for eating with unclean hands (Mark
7:1-5; Luke 11:37-39).
When a Gentile (a non-Jew)
became a convert to Judaism it was necessary for a man to be circumcised as
a sign of the covenant, and for both men and women to be ceremonially
immersed in “living water.” This tradition, called mikvah after the
pool of water in which it performed, continues to the present in both the
Orthodox and Conservative Jewish traditions.[5]
“During the
period of the Second Temple [c. 537-63 B.C.] the regulations
regarding conversion became fully formalized. … The Rabbis fashioned the
laws of conversion after the regulations of Torah [the Law given to
Moses by YHWH at Sinai] relating to purification after occurrences that
render a person ritually unclean. These are outlined in Leviticus 15. An
offering had to be brought. A male wishing to bring such an offering had
to be circumcised. Both male and female had to undergo immersion as an
act of cleansing. …
“Orthodoxy demands
circumcision for males, by a Mohel [a person who has been
specifically trained in the laws and technique of Milah, or
circumcision] and in the presence of a rabbinical court of three. … Both
males and females have to undergo submersion in a mikvah [a special pool
filled with “living water,” which must be in contact with the
groundwater of a stream or rainwater caught in a cistern; immersion in a
stream or ocean is also acceptable], also in the presence of a
rabbinical court. If it is a woman, the rabbis wait until she is full
submerged. Her companion then indicates the fact and the rabbis quickly
verify it. Some hold that it is sufficient for the rabbis to be in an
anteroom and listen to the ripple of the water.
“On emerging from the water,
the convert speaks the blessing: Barukh atta Adonai Elohenu Melekh
ha-Olam vetzuvanu al ha-Tevilah. Blessed are You, Lord our G-d,
Ruler of the universe, He who has commanded us concerning immersion.”[6]
While proselyte mikvah provided
a ritual cleansing for those who had been born “unclean” (i.e., not
Jews), the mikvah of Yochanan the Baptizer was specifically a mikvah of
“repentance for the forgiveness of sins” (Matt. 3:11; Mark 1:4; Luke 3:3;
Acts 13:24; 19:4) and an identification with his message that “the Kingdom
of G-d is at hand.” By accepting mikvah from Yochanan, those who were
receiving mikvah (being baptized) were expressing their repentance (Matt.
3:6; Mark 1:5) and their desire for forgiveness. They were making a public
testimony of their faith in the coming Kingdom, and declaring that they were
unworthy (“unclean”) to enter that Kingdom. It was also a preparatory and
symbolic act, as it prepared the one receiving mikvah for the ministry of
the One who was yet to come, and it symbolized the judgment that He would
bring. Those who rejected Yochanan’s mikvah of repentance would surely
suffer being “baptized” (i.e., immersed or totally overwhelmed) by the
coming judgment.
“A direct
link is established through Jesus’ own baptism by John; some of Jesus’
disciples had almost certainly been baptized by John (John 1:35-42);
Jesus, or some of his disciples, seems to have continued John’s practice
at the beginning of Jesus’ own ministry (John 3:22-26; but 4:1-2); and
in the cases of the disciples at Pentecost and of Apollos, it was
evidently not thought necessary to supplement their Johannine baptism by
baptism in the name of Jesus (Acts 2; 18:24-28).”[7]
That immersion was the form of
Yochanan’s baptism is further supported by the Revelator’s statement that
Yochanan was baptizing “in Aenon near Salim, because there was much water
there” (John 3:23), the “much water” being necessary both to effect full
immersion that was required by Torah and also to fulfill the requirements of
“living water” for the mikvah.
A brief note on Yeshua’s[8]
(Jesus’) mikvah by Yochanan is in order. Since Yeshua was (and eternally is)
G-d incarnate, and therefore by His very nature eternally free from sin, His
mikvah could not possibly have been a mikvah of “repentance for
forgiveness,” since He obviously had absolutely nothing for which He needed
to repent from or for which He needed to be forgiven. If Yeshua’s mikvah was
not a mikvah of repentance, then what was it?
Yeshua said that He had not come
to do away with Torah (the Law), but rather that Torah might be fulfilled
(Matt. 5:17). Torah required that before a man could enter the priestly
service (which occurred at age 30) he must first be ceremonially washed by
immersion (undergo mikvah) in “living” water, representing cleansing for
service, and anointed with oil, representative of the presence of Ruach
HaKodesh (the Holy Spirit) (Exod. 29:4, 7; Lev. 8:6, 12). When Yochanan
performed Yeshua’s mikvah, Torah concerning the mikvah for priestly service
was fulfilled (Matt. 3:15); when Ruach HaKodesh descended at that mikvah
(Matt. 3:16-17), the anointing was fulfilled not in type, as with earthly
priests, but in the reality which that type represented.
It is of significant interest
that when the priesthood was first established Aharon (Aaron), the first
High Priest, and his sons were washed, or “baptized,” for their priesthood
by the only prophet of G-d living at that time, Moshe (Moses). When Yeshua
was baptized for His priesthood, He was baptized by the only prophet of G-d
(besides Himself) living at that time, Yochanan.
It is also of interest, further
supporting the mode of Yochanan’s baptism, that at the time of
Mashiach[9] the “washing” for the priesthood was that of
ha-Tevilah in a Mikvah, which, as we have seen immediately
above, is identified by Judaism as immersion.
An adequate discussion of “Ruach
Ha Kodesh Baptism” (or “Holy Spirit Baptism”) is far beyond the scope of
this brief paper. In summary, however, there are two simultaneous events
which occur at the moment of salvation which may be understood as the
baptism of Ruach HaKodesh (“Holy Spirit baptism” or “the baptism of the Holy
Spirit”), neither one of which has anything whatsoever to do with any of the
so-called “sign gifts” or other supernatural manifestations, as claimed by
those in the Charismatic movement of Christianity.
In the first event (first in
terms of discussion, not in terms of occurrence, since both occur
simultaneously) the baptizing Agent (the Person who performs the
mikvah) is Ruach HaKodesh (the Holy Spirit) and the medium of baptism
(that into which the baptism occurs) is Yeshua HaMashiach (Jesus
Christ). Most Christians are familiar with the term “in Christ” (Rom. 8:1; 2
Cor. 5:17; Col. 1:2; 1 Thess. 2:14; 4:16; 1 Pet. 5:14 et al.), but
the author has met very few who have been able to effectively articulate
what it means for a believer to be “in Christ.”
The baptism of
Ruach HaKodesh (i.e., the Holy Spirit’s baptism) is to be rightly understood
as “that operation by which the individual believer is brought into organic
union with Christ.”[10]
|

This is the real and true baptism, of
which the ritual mikvah (water baptism) is only a symbol or a testimony. |
This operation
is itself the very process of salvation, which occurs when,
immediately upon coming to a saving faith in Yeshua HaMashiach as the Unique
Son of G-d (which by its very definition includes acceptance of Him as one’s
personal Savior and Lord), Ruach HaKodesh takes the sinner out of the world
(kosmos or world order), of which Satan is G-d (2 Cor. 4:4), and
literally places (immerses or “baptizes”) him or her into the Body
and Bride of Yeshua (Rom. 6:3; 1 Cor. 12:13; Gal. 3:27), which is the true
and invisible Miqra (or “Church”)[11] (Eph. 1:22, 23;
Col. 1:18; Rev. 19:7-9; 21:2, 9). The effect of this operation is that “the
believer is organically and vitally joined to the Lord and thus has become a
partaker of the standing, merit, and perfect worthiness of Christ.”[12]
“To be
baptized into Christ’s Body is to come under the power and Headship of
Christ; it is to be joined unto the Lord, to be identified with Him, to
partake of what He is and what He has done-not for a moment, but
unalterably.”[13] This is the real and true baptism, of
which the ritual mikvah (water baptism) is only a symbol or testimony.
In the second
event (which occurs simultaneously with the first), the Mikvah (Baptism)
in or with Ruach HaKodesh (the Holy Spirit), the
baptizing Agent is Yeshua HaMashiach and the medium of baptism is Ruach
HaKodesh. There are six passages of Scripture which speak to this experience
(Matt. 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 3:16; John 1:33; Acts 1:5; 11:6) in which, also
simultaneous with the moment of salvation, by the authority of Yeshua
HaMashiach, Ruach HaKodesh is given fully, completely, and irrevocably to
all those who believe, “and to come under the Spirit’s power and influence,
as every Christian does when he believes, is to have been baptized by that
influence. … This gift is the new birthright and, being possessed by all,
indicates that all who are saved are under the power of the Holy spirit,
which fact is, according to the strict meaning of the word
baptizw [baptizo],
a baptism”[14] (explained in
Lesson 2).
[ Previous ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ]
__________
Notes: (Click on the note number to return to the text.)
[1] The Baptist Faith and Message,
Article VII. The Sunday School Board of the Southern Baptist Convention,
Nashville, 1963.
[2] Charles C. Ryrie, Basic Theology, p.
422, Victor Books, Wheaton, IL, 1986.
[3] “Yochanan” is the Hebrew form of the
Baptizer’s name, and it is the name that Gabriel instructed his father to
give him. It is therefore the name by which this author will refer to him.
As nearly all of the individuals in the Bible are Jewish, the author strives
to use the Hebraic rather than the Hellenistic (Greek) form of Biblical
names, just has he would hope that others would use his own name correctly
rather than using some foreign version of his name. It is the author’s
conviction that G-d never intended for the teachings of Yeshua (Jesus) and
the Shliachim (Apostles) to be interpreted as a “new religion” or a “Gentile
religion” but rather as a “correction and completion” of Biblical Judaism
(as opposed to Rabbinic Judaism). Therefore the Hebrew Names and Titles of
Deity are also used, as is the tradition of using the spelling “God” to
refer to the One True G-d of the Bible to positively distinguish Him from
the false gods of the world’s religions.
[4] Ruach HaKodesh the Hebrew Name for the
Second Person of the G-dhead. The phrase literally means “Holy Breath.”
[5] It is also currently (August 2000) being
given serious consideration for adoption by the Messianic Jewish Movement.
[6] Rabbi Leo Trepp. The Complete Book of
Jewish Observance. New York: Behrman House, 1980, pp. 248-252.
[7] J.D.G. Dunn. “Baptism,” The Illustrated
Bible Dictionary. Wheaton: Tyndale, 1980, pp. 172-174.
[8] Yeshua is the Hebrew word for “salvation” —
it is the name that Gabriel instructed His mother Miriam to name Him, and it
is the name by which He was addressed by all His friends and family. It is
therefore proper that those who would call Him “Friend” should use His given
Name both when speaking to Him and when referring to Him.
[9] Mashiach is the Hebrew word for
“anointed,” and is commonly translated into English as Messiah. The Greek
translation is “Christos,” which has been Anglicized as “Christ.” As
Biblical Hebrew does not use vowels, there are many variations in the
phonetic spelling.
[10] Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic
Theology. Dallas: Dallas Seminary Press, 1975, v. 3, p. 337.
[11] The word “church” is a very unfortunate
and totally false translation of the Greek work ecclesia, which is in
turn a valid translation of the Hebrew word miqra, both of which
literally mean “called out” or “called out ones.” There is absolutely no
linguistic reason for either the word ecclesia or the word miqra
to be translated into English as “church.” If an appropriate “shorthand”
word were to be used, probably the most appropriate term would be “the
Elect” — which is precisely the term used both in the Hebrew Scriptures (the
so-called “Old Testament”) and in the Greek Scriptures (the so-called “New
Testament”) for those individuals to whom the traditional Christian Church
refers as “Old Testament Saints” as well as for those individuals to whom
the traditional Christian Church refers as “New Testament Saints.” A careful
search of the Bible will reveal that G-d makes no distinctions between His
Elect before the cross and His Elect after the cross. Both become “the
Called Out” by G-d’s sovereign election, and both are heirs to the Promise
based on their faith in Mashiach’s completed work of Redemption. Those
Saints before the cross looked forward to that event, albeit with incomplete
understanding; those Saints after the cross look back to that event. The
only distinction that G-d makes is between those who are justified by the
Blood of Yeshua, and those who are not. Those who are justified are a part
of Israel, and are full heirs to the covenants; those who are not justified
are not a part of Israel and have no part in the covenants. Believing Jews
and Believing Gentiles are therefore united in Mashiach’s Body. The
traditionally-accepted Christian distinction between “the Church” and
“Israel” is therefore unfounded; the actual distinction is between “national
Israel” and “the Elect” and “the unbelieving Gentiles.”
[12] Chafer, op. cit., v. 6, p. 142.
[13] Ibid., v. 6, p. 140.
[ Previous ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ]
Copyright ©1987-2001
http://familybible.org/Teaching/Theology/Baptism/Baptism1.htm
Last Revised
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
PLEASE NOTE: Due to a significant lack of interest in the Messianic Message in our geographical area, Adat
B'nei HaMelech has been forced (at least for the foreseeable future) to cease functioning as an active
congregation. These adverse circumstances have forced me to take a full-time secular position which will require
me to work evenings and weekends for the foreseeable future, precluding group Bible studies due to schedule
conflicts. I will, however, continue to operate this website as an on-line ministry for as long as the LORD leads
me to do so. As the LORD leads you, your continuing prayers and financial support to offset the on-going
web-hosting and other operating costs will be sincerely appreciated. — Ari
Site Design and
Content Copyright ©1995-2008 Family Bible Ministries. All rights Reserved.
All access to this Domain (including email) is subject to the Terms of Use
• Copyrights and Permissions •
Contact Us
The pages on this
website contain the name of G-d in various forms. If you print any of these
pages, please be sure to handle them with the appropriate amount of reverence and respect.
*Ari Levitt is the shem kodesh
of Dr. Rickard (Ari) Levitt-Sawyer. Except where otherwise
specifically indicated, the opinions expressed on this website are my own, are sometimes highly speculative in
nature and subject to differing intrpretations, and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of MJAA,
IAMCS, MBI, UMJC, or any other organization or individual. If you disagree with my opinions, please
CLICK HERE before contacting me about
it. |
|
|
 |
|