|
To understand the dynamics of
the transformation process by which a young person becomes totally enveloped
in an extremist cult, it is important to note the context from which he
comes. What kind of background factors characterize the young people who are
entering the New Age cults in such alarming numbers?
The majority of people who join new-age
cults are between eighteen and twenty-two years old at
the time of first contact. They are post-high school persons. This is when a
potential joiner is most vulnerable. A profile of the typical cult member
reveals that he or she is white, middle or upper-middle class, with at least
some college education and a nominally religious upbringing.
Most have grown up in average
American homes, and many have experienced varying degrees of communication
problems with their parents. A number have known the pain and deprivation of
a single-parent home, and perhaps for this reason some have strongly
identified with older cult leaders who provide a parental image.
There is the successful,
idealistic, very secure kind of person, who represents the most promising
prospect as far as the leadership is concerned. On the other hand, there are
clearly those recruits who have problem backgrounds and who have experienced
varying degrees of “failure” according to the standards of middle-class
America. These young people have dropped out of school, have been involved
in the drug scene, come from broken homes, or have a history of emotional
problems and unresolved personality conflicts.
Perhaps more than anything else,
the young people pursuing cults today are involved in a search for identity
and a quest for spiritual reality that provides clear-cut answers to their
questions.
An army of hitchhikers and
street people signify that American youth are running away from something.
Nevertheless, young people who
have not fled suburbia and their families are also experiencing a crisis of
identity. The characteristic ambiguity of adolescence has been compounded in
recent years by the liberation ethos that has pervaded our culture and
profoundly affected our sex-role relationships. Appropriate models for
adulthood are often unclear on are undergoing considerable change. “Even
such seemingly universal adult roles as mother and father are amorphous and
changing... For youth, therefore, the development of a coherent adult
identity and the resolution of generational discontinuities is becoming more
difficult,” reports Francine Daner.
This identity confusion is
commonplace among the children of affluence — the chief target of the cults.
Some young people who were
interviewed as part of this study had been pursuing spiritual rainbows for
many months and had moved from church to church or even cult to cult in
search of firm answers.
Cults not only provide firm
answers to every question, but also make promises that appeal to those
needing reassurance, confidence, and affirmation.
Although some young people who
enter cults have little or no religious background,
many have had nominal religious exposure. A few have had extensive
experience in traditional churches or synagogues. Invariably cult seekers
have found these conventional religious institutions to be lacking in
spiritual depth and meaning — incapable of inspiring commitment and
providing clear-cut answers, and often hypocritical to everyday life. They
view the religious life of their parents as shallow and perfunctory.
Any person experiencing an
identity crisis or involved in a serious spiritual quest is theoretically
vulnerable to the seductive outreach of the cults, but some are move
vulnerable than others. On the basis of evidence drawn from the life
histories of former members, it is clear that persons who have recently gone
through some kind of painful life experience or who find themselves in a
state of unusual anxiety, stress, or uncertainty are far more susceptible to
cultic involvement.
For example, students just
entering that strange and sometimes scary university world are particularly
vulnerable to the appeal of a cult masquerading as a warm, friendly group
offering fellowship and small-group intimacy to lonely freshmen.
Other precipitating life
experiences that increase vulnerability include such things as a recent
divorce of one’s parents or similar serious problem in the home; the
extended, critical illness of a family member; a break-up with a girl friend
or boy friend; poor academic performance or failure; and unpleasant
experiences with drugs or sex. When someone is feeling exceedingly anxious,
uncertain, hurt, lonely, unloved, confused, or guilty, that person is a
prime prospect for those who come in the guise of religion offering a way
out or “peace of mind.”
Some youth have had a single,
traumatic life experience that triggers entrance into a cult, but a
significant number might be characterized as having chronic emotional or
personality problems of a pathological nature. Dr. John G. Clark, a
psychiatrist, has spent several years researching the effects of cult
membership on the mental and physical health of young people. He declared,
“These inductees involved themselves in order to feel better, because they
are excessively uncomfortable with the outside world and themselves. Such
motivated conversions are ‘restitutive’ in that the ‘seeker’ is trying to
restore himself to some semblance of comfort in a fresh, though false,
reality.”
Mental health authorities feel
that individuals who constitute what Dr. Clark calls the “restitutive group”
run the risk of additional damage through prolonged exposure to extremist
cults that practice mind control and prevent or inhibit autonomous behavior.
The deterioration that may result is analogous to the fate of chronic
schizophrenics institutionalized for many years; they eventually lose the
ability to think and function with any degree of effectiveness, especially
in the outside world.
Even more disturbing is the fact
that young people who have no history of mental pathology, and who have
relatively normal, healthy personalities upon entering cultic groups, suffer
the destructive impact of a very real, very frightening form of thought
control or brainwashing that subjugates the will and stifles independent
thinking. There is increasing clinical evidence from the various behavioral
sciences for the existence of a syndrome of seduction and mental subversion
involving cult converts. This is a matter of both great human concern and
professional interest.
From the Christian perspective, there
clearly are spiritual dimensions to the seduction syndrome, and these are
discusses in the handout “The
Characteristics of Cultic Commitment.” First we must consider the
psychological and sociological components of mind control, or — as some
prefer to call it — “coercive persuasion.”
The word “brainwashing” is
somewhat imprecise, as it has been variously defined and applied.
Nevertheless, it regularly appears in scholarly literature along with more
academic-sounding equivalent terms like “thought control,” “mind control,”
“psychological kidnapping,” and “coercive persuasion.”
Social scientists have
emphasized the very important role that group influences play in thought
reform. They have pointed out striking similarities between what is
occurring in the contemporary cults and the brainwashing that took place in
China and Korea during the early 1950s. Rabbi Maurice Davis, an outspoken
critic of Moon, stated this concerning the Unification Church: “The last
time I ever witnessed a movement that had these qualifications: (1) a
totally monolithic movement with a single point of view and a single
authoritarian head; (2) replete with fanatical followers who are prepared
and programmed to do anything their master says; (3) supplied by absolutely
unlimited funds; (4) with a hatred of everyone on the outside; (5) with
suspicion of parents, against their parents — the last
movement that had those qualifications was the Nazi youth movement, and I
tell you, I’m scared.”
It is our contention that
psychologically persuasive techniques and the dynamics of spiritual
seduction combine with group forces and processes to cause youth caught up
in the cults to accept ideas, attitudes, and behaviors quite foreign to them
prior to their involvement in the groups.
The transformation of
personality and thinking that occurs in the cults includes, as already
suggested, a highly seductive process involving individuals who are already
quite susceptible:
1. The first crucial element in the syndrome is gaining access to potential
converts — recruitment tactics. Cultists have an uncanny ability to single
out such individuals in a crowd; they seem to sense those who are ripe for
the plucking. Frequently, deceitful means are used to entice a young person
to make initial inquiry. A former member of the Moon movement claims he was
instructed to be on the lookout for people wearing backpacks, people on the
move. He was also told to avoid Mormons and evangelical Christians — anyone
holding firm religious beliefs and possessing substantial knowledge of the
Bible was not considered worth the effort. Persons with some religious
background and slight acquaintance with Scripture were more promising
targets.
2. Next, once tentative interest has been expressed by the
potential convert, intense group pressure and groups activity are initiated.
Lectures, sermons, Bible studies, and indoctrination sessions are part of a
constant round of activity designed to surround the new recruit with an
all-encompassing rhetoric.
3. All ex-members of extremist cults report having
experienced some kind of sensory deprivation — usually food and sleep.
Starchy, low-protein diets combined with only four or five hours of sleep
each night wear down one’s physical and psychological defenses and make a
person even more vulnerable to indoctrination.
4. The imposition of guilt and fear is basic to the
brainwashing process. That a person’s eternal destiny will be jeopardized if
he abandons the group is a common belief. They are made to feel guilty even
if they wanted to be alone to think. A major emphasis of the demand for
purity is to bring out feelings of guilt on the part of the participants.
The rigorous standards are seldom met; the individual nearly always falls
short and is left remorseful and repentant. Alamo Christian Foundation is a
prime example of a cult that effects mind control through fear. They foster
an intense fear of a wrathful G-d.
5. Members of extremist cults undergo a dramatic change in
world view. Efforts are made to alter their former attitude toward and
conception of the world, the nature of reality, and the ends and purposes of
human life. This shift in world view is accomplished through a process of
resocialization that includes a “stripping process” by which the identity of
the individual is greatly weakened, sometimes destroyed. The person is
stripped of his personal possessions.
6. The cultist is stripped of his past. Renunciation and
rejection of his prior associations and relationships is mandatory. All
connections with family, friends, and the home community are severed. The
past must be submerged; reality becomes the present. Cultists not only claim
to have discovered a new “spiritual family,” but in many cases acquire a new
name. Some observers suggest that using Bible names or “spiritual” names
helps to avoid detection by searching parents and law enforcement personnel.
More pertinent to our analysis is the fact that acquiring a new name
reinforces the act of severing all ties, familial and cultural.
7. Without exception, the parents who contributed to this
research effort commented on the drastic, sometimes sudden personality
changes they observed in their children. Statements like “He is not the same
person” and “She’s not the same daughter I once knew” are common. Many
parents and friends of cult members have also observed changes in voice,
posture, mannerisms, and even handwriting.
8. There is ample evidence that brainwashing as practiced by
the cults impairs logical reasoning processes and alters interpersonal
relationship patterns. In some extreme cases, individuals have experienced a
loss of such basic skills as reading and simple arithmetic. This is most
evident in the groups that officially disparage the mind.
9. Finally, the assault on the convert’s prior identity and
his subsequently assuming a totally new identity sometimes involve a pattern
of personality regression. This is especially the case in the Moon movement,
where parents and other observers frequently report that converts have
regressed to the level of early teen dependence. A childlike ego state is
fostered in the person, and the wholesome innocence of early adolescence
appears to be upheld as an ideal.
Dr. Clark says, “The fact of a
personality shift in my opinion is established. The fact that this is a
phenomenon basically unfamiliar to the mental health profession I am certain
of. The fact that our ordinary methods of treatment don’t work is also
clear, as are the frightening hazards to the process of personal growth and
mental health.”
_______________
* This
material is derived from pp. 149-165 of Youth, Brainwashing, and the
Extremist Cults by Ronald Enroth.
|
Most of the
documents in this section of our site are compiled from a series of
lectures on the cults and world religions delivered by Prof. Rickard L. Sawyer, ThM, ThD, DMin
(Ari Levitt) and Prof. Grady L.
Davis, BD, MCM, PhD in the Department of Comparative Religion on the
Alameda, California, campus of Golden Gate School of Theology from
1983 to 1985, and in numerous churches in California and Tennessee from
1980 to 1995. Some minor editorial changes have been made to present a more
Messianic Jewish viewpoint than that of the original Baptist-oriented
presentation. |
[ Previous ] [ Up ] [ Next ] |