|
Contents:
Definition of a Cult
Characteristics of Cults
Types of Cults
Heterodox Christianity
The Appeal of the Cults
A cult is a
religious group who adheres to major doctrines which are pointedly
contradictory to orthodox Christianity. It deviates from the cardinal
doctrines of the Christian faith.
— Walter Martin
1. Cults are deviations. They are far from authentic, biblical,
orthodox biblical teaching.
2. Cults are corrective attempts. Cult founders often react to a
belief or practice common to the churches of their day. Mary Baker Eddy
pictured a “God of Love” in contrast to the “Severe Judge-God” proclaimed by
most Calvinist New England preachers of her day.
3. Cult converts come from religious backgrounds. Their journey to
this new faith is from a former faith, not from no faith at all.
4. Cult converts were failed by their church or synagogue. Most will
tell you that their spiritual journey, before they joined the cult, was in a
congregation where they were disappointed or disillusioned by something that
happened, such as an internal quarrel or congregational split.
5. Many cults are elitist groups. Most cults think that they are the
"One True Church."
There are any number of methods of
classifying cults. Because of the widely diverse nature of cults, and the
limits of any artificial classification system, it is virtually impossible
to develop a system that will provide a completely accurate “slot” into
which to classify every group. For sake of illustration, here are two
possible methods of classifying cults.
Classification by Scope of Interest
One possible method to use in
classifying cults is by the emphasis they place on one or more major areas
of their belief system.
1. The mind cults. These cults emphasize the importance of the mind
in religion. Some apply reason to religious questions. Others stress the
superiority of the mental over the material. Christian Science, the Unity
School of Christianity, and Religious Science are examples.
2. The millennial cults. These groups
began with in intense interest in the end of the world and the second coming
of the Messiah. All have a scheme of eschatology (last things) that is
significantly deviant from that held by historical Christianity. Jehovah’s
Witnesses, Mormons, and Seventh-Day Adventists[1] are examples.
3. East-West mixes, or imports. The faith of these groups is a
combination of Eastern and Western terms and thought patterns. The
Unification Church and Witness Lee are examples.
Another possible method of
classifying cults is by the source of their tradition, or from where they
derive their authority.[2]
1. The pseudo-Christian cults. “The term ‘pseudo-Christian’ is used
with Webster’s qualification ‘deceptive resemblance to.’ Unquestionably,
there are sincere born-again Christians who populate The Local Church and
The Church of the Living Word. But because of their aberrational departure
from historic orthodoxy and their subservience to authoritarian leadership,
these bodies are included in the Pseudo-Christian category. The main
criterion determining inclusion in this category [is] whether or not the
cult in question [makes] any attempt (sincere or deliberately deceptive) to
follow Christian teachings and traditions.” Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses,
and Unity would be in this category.
2. The personality cults. “While one sociological mark of a cult is
in its centralized control of dogma and practice, some groups seem to be
totally structured around the charisma of one man. His teachings are
incidental to the force of his personality. It is the subjective commitment
to who he is—not what he says—that has formed a following. ... The decision
warranting inclusion under Personality cults [is] made by observing whether
most adherents were initially attracted by the man more than the message.”
3. The occult/mystical cults. “The Occult/Mystical category includes
those cults which base their precepts on non-Christian traditions. The
essence of their systems is founded on a mystical model. In most cases, the
important factor lies in the experience offered by the cult’s philosophy,
not in its objective perimeters of doctrine. Most of these groups promote an
intuitional concept of reality rather than utilizing sensory perception. ...
To a greater or lesser extent, most (though not all) cults in this category
encourage occult and psychic exploration. As a result, this grouping is more
prone to involve spiritually dangerous practices of collusion with
supernatural forces.”
A major point that is missed by most
authors who write on the subject of cults, and which, therefore, affects
their cult classification systems, is that G-d is no respecter of man-made
organizations. The only groups of humanity that G-d specifically recognizes
in Scripture are the family, Israel, the Elect, and the lost. A person
cannot be either lost or saved by his organizational affiliation, only by
his relationship to G-d through the Messiah or his lack of that
relationship.
There are a large number of groups whose
doctrinal position is not in line with the position of “historical
Christianity.” “Evangelical Fundamentalists” (labels, unfortunately, seem to
be unavoidable) embrace a rather complex set of doctrinal truths that they
see to be clearly presented in Scripture. They frequently fail to recognize,
however, that there is only one single doctrinal truth that is absolutely
essential: Salvation depends solely upon one’s personal relationship with
the G-d of the Bible through the Second Person of that G-dhead, Adonai
Yeshua HaMashiach (the Lord Jesus Christ).
It is possible, therefore, for a person to
fully embrace the teachings of a group which falls outside the bounds of
“historical Christianity” and still be a born-again, blood-bought child of
G-d. I place these marginal groups in a class that I have named Heterodox
Christianity: “heterodox” because their teachings are not fully in accord
with the “cardinal doctrines” of the Christian faith; “Christianity” because
the individual members of the groups may be in the Body of Messiah in spite
of some very bad teaching.
Seventh-Day Adventists are one group I
classify within the category of Heterodox Christianity, primarily because of
their erroneous teachings on future things (annihilation of the wicked and a
millennium that occurs only in heaven) and their shift of authority from a
verbally-inspired Bible to the teachings of Mrs. White. However, it is still
possible for one to be a “good Adventist” and still be a “Christian.”
Conversely, it is impossible for one to be a Mormon or a Jehovah’s Witness
and still be a Christian, because the Mormons and Jehovah’s Witness’s
worship a totally different G-d than the G-d of the Bible.
Refer to the handout “Essentials of True Biblical Faith” for
additional information.
The Appeal of the Cults
There are many factors which make the
cults appealing to those who feel that they have somehow been failed by
their church or synagogue. As Bible-believers, we must make note of those
factors, and determine not to fail our brothers and sisters in those areas
that we can control.
1. Cults provide a sense of community. Most cults provide a
tight-knit sense of fellowship. Their members know each other and support
each other.
2. Cults provide a sense of status. Because they are “the one true
church,” members are not too concerned if they are not leaders in their
communities.
3. Cults provide opportunities for leadership not open in the “regular”
churches, especially for women. Many of the cults are extremely liberal
in dispensing titles and promoting members to positions of leadership, and
many (such as Unity) provide positions as “ministers” for women.
4. Some cults provide a more liberal climate. Unitarian Universalists,
for example, attract persons with an intense interest in social action and
an aversion to doctrinal teaching or statements. For example, an
acquaintance of mine who is a confessed Wiccan tells me that many Wiccans
are members of Unitarian Univeralist churches.
5. Cults offer set answers to hard questions. When will the world
end, and what will happen afterward? While many wonder about these
questions, some cultists claim to have the answers.
6. Some cults have demanding disciplines. The Moonie salesman sets a
personal goal for raising funds for the church, and strives to reach it
daily. Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses have long lists of things that they
must do and others that they must not do.
7. Some cults have a world vision. The Unification Church (the
Moonies) has set a goal that by 2027 the entire world will be members of
their church and will speak the “holy” Korean language.
8. Some cults “harmonize” Eastern and Western thought. Unity,
Christian Science, Scientology, and many others all blend elements from
Hinduism and Buddhism with Christianity.
9. Cults minister in crises. The persistent visiting of Mormon and
Jehovah’s Witness representatives in American homes uncovers many
individuals with needs that are not being met.
10. Cults reach minority groups. The Unity School of Christianity
appeals to the wealthy because it has stressed prosperity. Jehovah's
Witnesses attract people from the lower economic scale because they teach a
total aversion to “worldly” success.
11. Some cults stress human potential. These appeal to health and
wealth, and do not accept man as sinful.
12. Cults involve their members. Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses
provide many opportunities for their members to serve.
_______________
1. Bob Larson and many other cult teachers
others classify Seventh-Day Adventism as a cult; Walter Martin and I
classify them as “heterodox” rather than as a cult.
[RETURN]
2. This is the method used by Bob
Larson in
Larson's Book of Cults, and I personally use a slightly modified
version of that method. However, I do not necessarily place all groups in
the same classification that Larson does [see note 1, above]. The quotes
which follow in this section are from Larson.
[RETURN]
[ Up ] [ Next ] |